Drafting and reviewing a contract before signature involves more than reading a few clauses. A contract is the legal framework of a relationship and should clarify obligations, payments, security, liabilities and dispute resolution from the outset. Sound review before signing can prevent many later disputes.
In a contractual dispute, choosing the correct legal claim is also important. An action to compel performance, a claim for payment or damages, termination, nullity, enforcement of security, or referral to arbitration each have different conditions and effects and must be assessed against the contract and the actual documents in the case.
Article 10 of the Iranian Civil Code recognises freedom of contract within statutory limits. Articles 190, 219 and 220 provide important bases for reviewing validity, binding force and contractual effects. The text must therefore be analysed alongside the relevant law and custom.
The best time for legal review is before signing and undertaking obligations. If a dispute has already arisen over performance, payment, delivery, security, termination or damages, review the contract and related documents together before acting.
The role of a contract lawyer in the process of agreement and dispute
Initial assessment: Review the signatories’ identity and authority, subject matter, attachments, amount, timetable and security to identify risks and ambiguities.
Drafting clear obligations: Each obligation must be measurable as much as possible in terms of the subject, deadline, criterion for performance, method of delivery and the person responsible for its implementation.
Anticipating breach and loss: The contract should provide suitable remedies for delay and non-performance, agreed sums for breach, security and provisions for termination or other ways of ending the relationship.
Choosing the dispute-resolution course: Sometimes negotiation and a formal legal notice are sufficient; in other cases an action to compel performance, a claim for damages, termination, arbitration, or another action is required.
Document management: Organise the contract, addenda, payment receipts, minutes, messages, correspondence, handover records and security documents, and link them to the legal claim.
Follow-up through enforcement of the outcome: Issuance of a judgment or arbitral award is not the end of the matter; performance of the obligation, recovery of money or damages, and enforcement of the judgment or award may also require independent follow-up.
Contracting agreements and performance of the work
An agreement between a client and a contractor, works operator, skilled tradesperson or service provider should define the scope and specifications of the work, timetable, price and payment method, handover, security and liability for delay or defective performance in precise, measurable terms.
Important and recurring contract topics are examined on separate pages. Choose the topic matching your contract or dispute to see the requirements, documents, practical points and related issues.
Command of the foundations and effects of contracts: Reviewing a contract is not merely reading a few clauses. The lawyer must analyse the conditions for validity of the transaction, the binding force of contracts, the scope of the obligations, the customary and legal effects of the contract, and remedies for breach alongside the text of the agreement.
Identifying risk before signature: Many disputes arise from ambiguity in the subject matter of the obligation, the time of performance, the method of payment, the security, the authority of the signatory or the termination conditions. A proactive review can reveal these risks before a dispute arises.
Clear drafting of obligations and remedies for breach: The contract must identify who will perform each obligation, by when and against which measurable criteria, and the consequences of delay or breach.
Carefully distinguishing termination of a valid contract, nullity from inception, and enforcement of the obligation: These titles do not have the same effects. The choice of legal action should be in line with the cause of the dispute, the text of the contract and the client's objective so that the dispute is not raised on an incorrect basis.
Management of contractual documents and correspondence: Contracts, addenda, receipts, minutes, messages, handover records and security documents help prove performance or breach. Review them systematically and for their relevance to the issue.
Planning the dispute-resolution path through enforcement: Sometimes negotiation or a formal legal notice is sufficient; in other cases litigation, arbitration, or enforcement of security is needed. A contract lawyer should plan a realistic route to resolve the dispute and implement the result from the outset.
Important questions before taking contractual action
Before signing the contract, how should the identity and authority of the signatory and the original documents be checked?
If the other party does not fulfill its obligation within the stipulated time, Is it better to require the fulfillment of the obligation or to demand damages?
How should an agreed-sum clause specify the amount, starting date and type of breach?
What are the differences between termination, termination by mutual agreement (eqāleh), automatic termination, and contractual nullity, and what is the effect of choosing the wrong legal characterization?
How should contributions, profit shares and exit arrangements be clarified in a partnership or investment agreement?
Is the arbitration clause appropriate for this contract and how should the arbitrator's authority be determined?
Relevant legal sources
Iranian Civil Code («قانون مدنی»)
Iranian Code of Civil Procedure («قانون آیین دادرسی دادگاههای عمومی و انقلاب در امور مدنی»)
Iranian Commercial Code («قانون تجارت»)
This list identifies the principal legal provisions relevant to the page. The applicable law and amendments must be checked against the dates, subject matter and circumstances of each case.
Review of contractual validity must address the parties’ intention and consent, legal capacity, a sufficiently definite subject matter and a lawful purpose, together with mandatory rules and any formal requirements for that contract type.
In many relationships, an oral agreement can be the source of an obligation; however, its content is usually more difficult to prove and some transactions or legal effects are subject to specific legal formalities. Therefore, the subject of each contract must be examined separately.
Key matters include the parties’ identity and authority, subject matter and price, timing and method of performance, security, termination and other provisions for ending the contract, damages, attachments and dispute resolution.
An agreed sum for breach is an amount or compensation formula stipulated for non-performance or delay. Whether it can be claimed depends on the clause, particular breach, due date and relationship to the main obligation.
Termination (faskh) usually ends a valid contract through a statutory or contractual right. Nullity concerns the absence of requirements for contractual validity. Their legal effects differ.
Depending on the type of obligation, the contract terms, and the documents, it may be possible to consider compelling performance, claiming payment or damages, using guarantees, termination, or other statutory and contractual remedies.
No. The choice of arbitration should be weighed against the type of relationship, the value and complexity of the dispute, the method of selecting the arbitrator, the extent of his or her authority and the possibility of enforcing the award. The law also stipulates conditions for referring a dispute to arbitration.
A general template may help familiarise a person with the structure, but it usually does not cover the transaction’s particular risk, the parties’ authority, guarantees, permits, payment method, and remedies appropriate to that relationship.
Methods of contact
For legal advice or follow-up on a case, contact us using one of the methods below.